Instead of Attorney General Jess Sessions investigating the Clinton's, former Democratic National Committee Chair Deborah Wasserman Schultz, Hillary's aide Huma Abidin, former FBI Director James Comey, and Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller et al. for their role in the Uranium One deal. He goes after cannabis users. Regardless of your views on cannabis, a natural plant used for centuries for medicinal purposes; should this be the priority of the justice dept. when there are clearly bigger issues of greater importance?
This justice department has lost its way; having been bought and paid for, once again, by BIG pharma.
Quite frankly, I'm not O.K. with this. Jeff Sessions needs to be replaced with a person of integrity and the resolve to deal with the Clinton's and their cabal. Trump drain the swamp and get rid of Sessions.
The Best in uncensored news, information, and analysis
Sessions Wages War on Natural Cannabis, As He Grants Maker of Fentanyl a Monopoly on Synthetic THC
I came across this video regarding something I have been concerned with for several years now. Since the late 1990's there is an increase of stratospheric aerosol engineering (SAG) spraying throughout skies of America. The days of being able to go outside, look up to see clear blue skies are gone. This is the first of many post I am doing on this issue. The intent of these posts are to shed some light on what is really going on.
Dane Wigington is the lead researcher for www.geoengineeringwatch.org and has investigated all levels of geoengineering, solar radiation management, and global ionosphere heaters like HAARP. Dane has appeared on an extensive number of interviews and films to explain the environmental dangers we face on a global level from the ongoing climate engineering assault.
Dane Wigington's website provide the best information on this topic I've found on the Internet thus far. Check it out and support their efforts to put a stop to this insanity.
This article is a result of a geoengineering conference held in 2010.
David Keith is likely the most internationally recognized geoengineer. Keith is, in my opinion, the epitome of what is wrong with an unfortunately high percentage of the scientific community. There is extreme arrogance without a shred of oversight or accountability. In so many cases there is absolutely no regard for the consequences of the experiments that the “scientists” carry out on us all in one form or another. In the 5 minute video below, David Keith’s completely cavalier approach to experimenting with life on Earth is clearly visible when I confronted him at an AAAS conference. Below this video is an “Open Letter To David Keith” which was penned by the “Chemtrails Project UK”. My thanks to this group for their well written document that can and should be used to wake the public up to David Keith and all those like him, the more exposure for the Keith letter the better.
An Open Letter to Dr. David Keith
Dr. Keith is one of the most prominent proponents of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG). In this open letter, we challenge Dr. Keith with a number of concerns regarding the SAG proposal.
Dear Dr. Keith,
I have seen your Colbert Report interview where you appear to publicise and promote the idea of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) – namely, the spraying of thousands of tonnes of toxic substances into our atmosphere as an attempt to fight global warming.
SAG, by your own admission, is expected to kill 10,000 people in the first year alone.
Of further concern is the overwhelming amount of evidence that indicates such practices are not mere proposals but are already happening in our skies. (Incidentally, as you will find in The Directive, this would not be the first time the UK population has been covertly sprayed.)
Please would you provide me your responses to each of the following questions:
Aircraft trails that persist, spread and block out the sunlight are now being witnessed on a near-daily basis in the UK (and other countries). So why are you presenting the notion of blocking out sunlight with aircraft trails as a new possibility for the future when it is something that is clearly happening already?
With the SAG proposal, why are you promoting the spraying of toxic chemicals such as sulphuric acid and/or aluminium oxide to block out our sunlight when we are already observing that the same effects – according to our government – can be achieved with natural condensation trails?
If you believe the sun cannot be blocked out by natural condensation trails, do you concur that all these persistent, spreading trails that we now witness blocking out our sunlight cannot be composed of “essentially pure ice” and are, therefore, not ordinary condensation trails?
To what extent do you believe the plethora of persistent, spreading aircraft trails that we witness today may be contributing to climate change?
If SAG were to commence officially with the spraying of thousands of tonnes of aluminium oxide, should we expect our lower atmosphere to exhibit a grey/silvery haze – much like how we already witness on a near-daily basis?
Would it also be reasonable to expect that, being military planes, the vast majority of geoengineering aircraft leaving persistent trails would not appear on real-time commercial flight-tracking services such as Flightradar24 and Plane Finder – just as we witness today?
Could we also expect that these unidentifiable planes be the ones that would often leave grid patterns in the sky – again, just like we are experiencing today?
To what extent do you believe the persistent, spreading, sunlight-blocking trails that we now commonly experience are contributing to the acknowledged phenomenon of global dimming?
As a result of spraying 20,000 tonnes of sulphuric acid into the atmosphere, you say there will be around 10,000 deaths in the first year. Do you regard that as an acceptable death rate, and – taking into account the higher incidence of terminal illnesses that will result from these activities, along with the increased amounts that will be sprayed in the following years – by how much might the annual death rate increase as time goes on?
What happened to the suggestion of putting 20,000,000 tonnes of aluminium into the atmosphere, as you proposed in 2010 at the AAAS conference in San Diego? And what would be the associated annual death rates expected in this scenario?
You admit concerns over which country controls the SAG “thermostat” and allude to possible resulting conflict. On a similar note, does it also concern you that “chemtrails” were described in the first draft of the USA’s Space Preservation Act as an “exotic weapons system” but was later omitted… I.e., does it concern you that the USA has not only alluded to technologies similar to SAG being be used for military gain but has also made efforts to conceal it – and, by association, may use SAG with that same military intention?
I look forward to your response to each of these questions.
PS – This is an open letter, published at chemtrailsprojectuk.com and geoengineeringwatch.org where our future correspondence will also be published.
(Natural News) Just days after the release of a jaw-dropping video lecture called the Science Agenda to Exterminate Blacks, a bombshell science paper has emerged that confirms the use of covert sterilization chemicals in World Health Organization vaccines deployed in Africa. Entitled, “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World,” the paper documents the covert deployment of an infertility chemical in vaccines that are administered to young black women in Kenya:
Oller, J.W., Shaw, C.A., Tomljenovic, L., Karanja, S.K., Ngare, W., Clement, F.M. and Pillette, J.R. (2017), HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World. Open Access Library Journal, 4: e3937.https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103937
The paper confirms exactly what Natural News reported earlier in the week: That a covert depopulation program is being run by the World Health Organization, targeting Africans for extermination via infertility chemicals administered under the guise of “vaccines.” These vaccines, notably, contain chemicals that are administered without the informed consent of the women being injected. In fact, the women are deliberately lied to and told the injections are meant to “protect your health.” But the real reason for the shots is to exterminate blacks in the name of “science” and “medicine.”
I’ve detailed all this in this powerful one-hour lecture that’s already getting rave reviews across the ‘net. Watch the full lecture below, and visit Eugenics.news for more coverage of race-targeted extermination efforts being waged today under the banners of “science” and “medicine.”
While we all sympathize with what happened with the shooting in Sutherland Springs, Texas this past weekend. The main stream media is reporting this to be the largest mass shooting in a church in America. Let's not forget the US Gov't carried out the largest church massacre - at the "Branch Davidian Seventh Day Adventist" church in Waco, Texas just (24) years ago where (82) men, women and children died.
Source: Never Forget: The US Gov’t Carried Out the Largest Church Massacre—24 Years Ago, In Texas
Our source material comes from the FBI’s own vault, which contains two files on the case against Vernon Howell, also known as David Koresh. Koresh was the leader of the “Branch Davidians Seventh Day Adventists.” According to the FBI case file, Koresh was believed to have been holding people against their will at his compound in Waco, Texas, potentially guilty of “involuntary servitude and slavery” charges.
In 1992, Child Protective Services (CPS) was called in to investigate the accusations. After a thorough investigation, CPS concluded no one was being held at the compound against their will, nor any child abuse, and the federal prosecutor, who reviewed the report, saw no reason to prosecute Koresh. On October 16th, 1992, the FBI closed the case against Koresh and the allegations he was abusing children and holding his followers against their will.
Even after finding no ground for further action, the events that unfolded over the next (51) days led to this travesty of justice.
Pediatrician are now threatening parents with "filing a CPS Report" on them if they don't participate in their vaccine programs.
Honestly, what they are not telling you is "why" 100% participation is being required for all patients. What they are noting telling the parents is the pediatrician is paid tens of thousands of dollars by the insurance companies for vaccinating based on a 63% participation rate. In other words, if enough parents don't participate the pediatrician will lose the entire bonus; its all or nothing. So, in reality, its about the money, it has NOTHING to do with the efficacy, safety or health and welfare of the infant or child. See one example here: BlueCross® BlueShield® 2016 Performance Recognition Program.
So now one can understand why, for example Dr. Mike is so adamant about requiring everyone of his "patents" getting vaccinated.
Based on what this blogger has discovered, seriously reconsider taking your child to a pediatrician or at the very least, do your homework before hand. Ask your pediatrician if he or she participates in these types of insurance incentive programs. Ask your pediatrician if they vaccinate their own children. Or you risk having Child Protective Services called on you; this is a nightmare you don't want to have happen to you or your family. There a lot of very good alternatives to the traditional allopathic physicians route, that are legitimately efficacious, safe and wholesome for your children.
Pediatrician Dr. Mike Ginsberg posted a stern message about his opinion of “anti-vaxxers” (families who opt not to vaccinate) on his Facebook page back in 2015. The message gained attention at the time, and it’s going viral all over again.
“In my practice, you will vaccinate and you will vaccinate on time,” Ginberg’s post, which has since been taken down, begins. He continued on to say that parents who choose not to vaccinate will be asked to leave his practice. What’s more: “I will file a CPS [child protective services] report (not that they will do anything) for medical neglect, too,” he writes.
Here’s his message in full:
“IN MY PRACTICE YOU WILL VACCINATE AND YOU WILL VACCINATE ON TIME. YOU WILL NOT GET YOUR OWN ‘SPACED-OUT’ SCHEDULE THAT INCREASES YOUR CHILD’S RISK OF ILLNESS OR ADVERSE EVENT. I WILL NOT HAVE MEASLES-SHEDDING CHILDREN SITTING IN MY WAITING ROOM. I WILL ANSWER ALL YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT VACCINE AND PRESENT YOU WITH FACTS, BUT IF YOU WILL NOT VACCINATE THEN YOU WILL LEAVE MY PRACTICE. I WILL FILE A CPS REPORT (NOT THAT THEY WILL DO ANYTHING) FOR MEDICAL NEGLECT, TOO.
I HAVE PATIENTS WHO ARE PREMATURE INFANTS WITH WEAK LUNGS AND HEARTS. I HAVE KIDS WITH COMPLEX CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE. I HAVE KIDS WHO ARE ON CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA WHO CANNOT GET ALL OF THEIR VACCINES. IN SHORT, I HAVE PATIENTS WHO HAVE TRUE SPECIAL NEEDS AND TRUE HEALTH ISSUES WHO COULD SUFFER SEVERE INJURY OR DEATH BECAUSE OF YOUR MAGICAL BELIEF THAT YOUR KID IS SOMEHOW MORE SPECIAL THAN OTHER CHILDREN AND THAT WHAT’S GOOD FOR OTHER CHILDREN IS NOT GOOD FOR YOURS. THIS PEDIATRICIAN IS NOT PUTTING UP WITH IT.
NEVER HAVE, NEVER WILL.”
Read entire article here
Christian parents need to do their homework on this article. Because he is absolutely correct, if the baby was born in a hospital and the parents did not make a proper claim at birth. The state takes jurisdiction and grants the parents privileges, i.e., parental rights over the child which can be revoked. However, if the parents make the proper claim at birth and do not grant jurisdiction to the state, the state has no say in how the parent decide to educate their children and can not revoke parental rights.
by Terri LaPointHealth Impact News
A law professor at the oldest law school in the nation believes that there is no inherent right to parent one’s own children.
In an interview for CRTV about homeschooling, Professor James G. Dwyer told syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin that:
The reason that parent-child relationship exists is because the state confers legal parenthood on people through its paternity and maternity laws.
An investigation into Dwyer’s writings and history reveals that this alarming statement was not an exaggerated statement taken out of context or misrepresented by a conservative journalist. Instead, the statement appears to be a foundational core belief held by a man who formerly worked in New York state family courts as a Law Guardian, which is the equivalent of a Guardian ad Litem.
Dwyer’s writings now influences policy within the family court system.
James Dwyer teaches college students at William and Mary College in historic Williamsburg, Virginia. Thomas Jefferson, the third United States President and primary author of the Declaration of Independence, was instrumental in establishing William and Mary’s law school program
Dwyer has been a prolific writer on the subject of children’s rights, and his views stand in direct contrast to the Founding Father who penned these immortal words:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, …
Instead of proclaiming the historical, biological, unalienable right of parents to have the liberty to teach their own children, Professor Dwyer told Michelle Malkin that:
That’s the state that empowers parents to do anything with children, to take them home, to have custody, and to make any kind of decisions about that.
That philosophy plays right into the hands of Child Protective Services officials who believe that it is the state’s right to decide who may or may not parent their own children.
As far back as 1994, Professor Dwyer wrote “Parents’ Religion and Children’s Welfare: Debunking the Doctrine of Parents’ Rights,” published in the California Law Review. In it, he challenged the assumption that “parents should have some rights in connection with the raising of their children,” going as far as to discuss provisions “under the legal regime I propose.”
Question of WHO Controls Children – Parents or State?
It is clear from the 1994 article that he resents any schooling taught from a religious perspective, whether it is from parents sending their children to a Christian school, or from parents rejecting the secularism taught in public schools who choose to homeschool and teach religious principles at home.
Perhaps not surprising is the fact that his own parents sent him to a private Catholic parochial school. (Source) His distaste for that experience colors his writings and philosophy.
Ironically, he wrote almost 25 years ago that:
No one should possess a right to control the life of another person no matter what reasons, religious or otherwise, he might have for wanting to do so.
However, if government, both state and federal, were to implement his philosophy and suggestions into the family court system, then the logical outcome is what currently happens to thousands of children within the foster care/adoption system – the lives of the children are controlled by the foster parents and the social workers.
Testimony given to Health Impact News from both parents and former foster children show that once Child Protective Services is involved, their lives are no longer their own, and CPS micromanages almost every aspect of their lives.
Should the State Choose Parents for All Babies Born?
It is readily apparent from his writings that he values “children’s rights,” but the basic inherent right of any child to have a relationship with their own biological parents seems to elude him. He even believes that it is the right of the state to choose the parents for a child.
In his article, “A Constitutional Birthright,” Dwyer argues:
Courts should recognize that newborn babies, much more clearly than birth parents, have fundamental interests at stake in the state’s selection of legal parents and, therefore, a much stronger claim to constitutional protection.
The reality is that children who are adopted almost universally have a drive as they grow older to find their “real parents.” It is largely adults who were adopted as children who push for open adoption. There is something within them that needs to find out where they came from and who they are.
In the name of “children’s rights,” lawyers and policy makers such as James Dwyer would deny them the fundamental right to know their own heritage and parents in the event that the state decides to “select” their parents for them.
This convoluted logic is the antithesis of parental rights, and at the same time, it stands in stark contrast to the biological, psychological, emotional, spiritual, physiological, and even health needs of children.
Children need their parents. Studies and child welfare data shows that children thrive and grow better in their own homes than in foster care. Even if their own home is less than ideal, children who are taken from their families and placed into foster care or adopted out are at least 6 times more likely to be raped, molested, abused or killed than if they were left at home
Foster Care Children are Worse Off than Children in Troubled Homes – The Child Trafficking Business
Lone Radical Voice or Influence for Government Policy?
Unfortunately, as radical as Professor Dwyer’s philosophy of parental and child rights is, he appears to have influence in policy making.
His works were cited as sources for an article, “The Harms of Homeschooling,” by Robin L. West, published in Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly.
The author sees homeschoolers as a threat to the state system, and says that the vast majority of referrals to Child Protective Services – 95% – come from public school teachers and administrators. (Note: The data we have found indicates that the figure was less than 20% in 2015, but school personnel still represent the largest group of reporters to CPS, followed by law enforcement, and medical personnel – Source.)
Other professors and colleagues at William and Mary College have praised his influence. Neal Devins has high praise for him, which should be alarming to every person in the United States who is concerned about parental rights:
Jim Dwyer has done what most academics aspire to–to change the conversation in their field. Jim’s work on children’s rights and his questioning of widely shared assumptions about parental authority have transformed the academic dialogue about the parent-child-state relationship.
State Control Over Children to Implement Mandatory Vaccines?
Dwyer argues that homeschooling can shield parents from being reported to CPS.
Another concern presented by West is that homeschooled children are less likely to be fully vaccinated, and thus present a theoretical public health risk.
Many parents would argue that the risk is in the vaccinations, but those who embrace the philosophies of Dwyer and West are more likely to ignore those parental concerns.
Dwyer Praises Clinton’s Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 Which Increased Child Trafficking
Among parents fighting to get their children home and out of the control of Child Protective Services, probably the most hated piece of legislation is the Clinton’s Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA).
The law provides financial incentives to state social workers and agencies to steal children away from their families, even if they have not abused or harmed their children.
There are billions of dollars secured by states through the Title IV-E funding in ASFA.
Child Kidnapping and Trafficking: A Lucrative U.S. Business Funded by Taxpayers Called “Foster Care”
Professor James Dwyer sees this as moving in the direction that he advocates. He praises ASFA and says that family law is:
becoming more child-centered and protective in order to avoid the social costs of harm to children. A great example is the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act, which requires states to authorize termination of parental rights in some cases before a child has been maltreated, … (Source)
And so the war for America’s children continues, pitting parents against the State. Those who choose to homeschool their children are clearly standing in the way of the objectives of the State.
What is it going to take for the judiciary to do its job and indict these Bank Directors and CEO's and all involved with the fraud surrounding this illegal activity? Has this country gone too far down the slippery slope of total corruptions and complete debauchery? What no one is reporting on is the fact these banks have stolen everyone's identity through copyrights, patents and trademarks. The one who owns the copyright, owns the data, i.e., identity. This is done when the unsuspecting homeowner signs documents to get a 'mortgage' on their home. Wells Fargo is the custodian of all these bogus mortgage accounts. This is the real story behind all these "bogus" accounts. The question needs to be asked, do these accounts contain funds? If so, where did these funds originate? Are the name holders of these accounts entitlement holders of these funds?
As the tally of fake Wells Fargo accounts balloons to 3.5 million, Congress has yet to discipline the executives, while the financial giant has only paid fines. A coalition of 33 groups is now demanding new hearings and for the bank to be held accountable.
Wells Fargo and Company increased its estimate of how many accounts were created by 67 percent Thursday. The mega bank issued shocking new disclosures, showing 1.4 million more bogus customer accounts had been created, a significant increase from previous estimates, the New York Times reported.
In addition, Wells Fargo admitted to yet another impropriety, stating that they enrolled more than a half-million customer accounts into their online bill pay service without notifying them. The embattled bank has since agreed to pay out $910,000 to customers who accrued fees or charges related to the unknown accounts.
“We are working hard to ensure this never happens again and to build a better bank for the future,” Wells Fargo CEO Timothy J. Sloane said in a statement, the Times reported.
There has not yet been word if executives with the bank will be summoned back to Washington to face lawmakers for yet another round of questioning following last year’s Capitol Hill hearing with then-CEO John Stumpf.
During that hearing, Wells Fargo and their former CEO paid big bucks, but no other actions have been taken by Congress to thwart future offenses by the company. Now, 33 organizations have banded together to call for new congressional hearings relating to Wells Fargo’s questionable practices.
Two groups, Americans for Financial Reform and Public Citizen, are leading the charge to stage new hearings, The left-leaning organizations sent a letter Thursday to the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee, asking to bring Wells Fargo executives back to Capitol Hill to answer for the newly found malpractices.
US Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), head of the Senate Banking Committee, tweeted, “Wells Fargo harmed millions more customers than originally disclosed, and continues to avoid accountability.”
And Representative Maxine Waters (D-California), suggested in a statement that Wells Fargo’s wrongful acts may be too big to manage.
“This disgraceful, illegal, and widespread misconduct is exactly why I will be introducing legislation that breaks up banks – like Wells Fargo – that repeatedly engage in consumer abuses, so that they can never harm consumers again,” she said, according to Bloomberg.
Progressive firebrand US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) called Wells Fargo’s new disclosure “unbelievable” in a tweet Thursday.
I was taught as a young boy by my mother, "...be sure your sins will find you out." You see the truth is like cream - it always rises to the top. Whenever someone tries to suppress it with lies and deception, it never works - sooner or later the truth comes out. Hopefully, these treasonous conspiratorial perpetrators - the Clintons, Comey, Lynch, Mueller, et al. will be exposed for the criminals they are...What former FBI Director James Comey did is disgusting, despicable and a breach of trust of his duties as the highest ranking law enforcement agent. In my view, he, along with Lynch and the Clintons ought to be indicted and imprisoned for their crimes against the American people.
SOURCE: DC WHISPERS
The New York Post’s John Crudele had an interesting column outlining how the bogus Democrat/Media/Deep State instigated Trump investigation is backfiring on Democrats as the American people grow increasingly weary of repeated allegations without actual proof.Beyond that fatigue is something even more concerning for Democrats. The investigation is actually shedding light on wrongdoing by figures like Hillary Clinton and James Comey – NOT Donald Trump.
Check it out:
There’s a lot going on in the Hillary Clinton/Donald Trump/Russia investigation that all the highfalutin’ newspapers that cover politics are still trying to ignore.Well, investors had better know this stuff before it bites them in the assets. So here goes.Numerous reports coming out of the Senate Judiciary Committee last week said that former FBI Director James Comey made the decision not to refer Clinton for prosecution long before he even interviewed key witnesses, including Hillary.Remember, the Republicans now control this committee. So bad news isn’t going to be stifled anymore.Clinton, you probably remember, “lost” her private emails, which she’d been storing on a personal computer server. Comey chastised her harshly in a televised speech but then said there was a unanimous decision not to recommend prosecution.Clinton’s emails, which were stolen by the Russians, have never been found. But as I’ve mentioned numerous times, the messages are still in the possession of the National Security Agency (NSA), which offered to give them to the FBI.Comey turned down that offer, according to a source who has been very reliable.I’ve also mentioned that Comey fibbed when he said his agents unanimously agreed that prosecution was unnecessary. In fact, my source says that FBI agents were irate about the decision not to go after Clinton.The controversy got pretty intense, which may be why Comey forced agents who worked on the Clinton matter to sign additional nondisclosure agreements.There was another important development last week when a federal judge ordered the FBI to disclose more details about how it handled the Clinton investigation. That could put Comey in a hotter spot than he’s already in.What’s this got to do with the investigation of Trump and any influence the Russians may have had over the last presidential election? Absolutely nothing.But as I’ve said before, any investigation of Trump was likely to backfire when investigators started to look at the Democrats and their dealings.And that’s exactly what is starting to happen.
Full report: HERE
Clearly James Comey was involved in covering up for Hillary Clinton while at the same time weaponizing the FBI to be used against Donald Trump – both very serious miscarriages of justice.
Here’s the thing – Comey has already indicated how his actions were colored by input from then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch of the infamous secret snakes-on-a-plane meeting with Bill Clinton.
Loretta Lynch answered only to Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett.
Mother Blamed for Baby’s Vaccine Injuries – Baby Adopted Out as Parents Face Jail
by Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff
In December 2013, in the State of Florida, Ms. Rebecca Wood gave birth to Javoni, a seven-pound baby boy with mild infant jaundice. Doctors assured her that jaundice was relatively common in newborns and told her that he would recover from the condition in a few days.
Although his health initially improved, his health deteriorated significantly within hours of receiving a series of routine vaccinations just eight weeks later. Rebecca explained:
Immediately after his two-month routine vaccinations, my son became very ill. He had constant diarrhea. Diarrhea after vaccinations is not uncommon; however, his diarrhea continued for days.
We took him to the emergency room, concerned since his diarrhea had not stopped. They transferred him to the Tallahassee Memorial Hospital due to elevated temperature and ultimately he was admitted. They did various blood tests and gave him antibiotics. The diarrhea continued.
He was released from the hospital after three nights with antibiotics. We followed up with his pediatrician’s office because we were still concerned that the diarrhea had not stopped. He also was not gaining any weight. The doctors did not appear to be very concerned.
One evening, Javoni was coughing non-stop. I called the after-hours nurse and they advised that he sleep in his bouncer. He started spitting up more than normal. Once again, [we took] a trip to the pediatrician and their solution was to provide him with Zantac for possible acid reflux.
The vaccinations that Javoni received were the following:
DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis)
IPV (inactivated polio)
HIB (haemophilus influenzae type B)
PVC 13 (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine)
Hep B (hepatitis B)
Despite his mother following all of the pediatrician’s advice, instead of improving as one would expect, Javoni’s health continued to deteriorate. A few days later, Rebecca was devastated to discover that her son’s arm appeared to be hanging limp.
This is a story getting very little attention in the main stream media, and yet it has huge potential for exposing blatant fraud, the complete corruption of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Clinton's, the Global Initiative Foundation; and their involvement in the homicide of Seth Rich - the now deceased DNC staffer found dead after allegedly leaking the DNC "John Podesta" emails to Wikileaks.org right before the 2016 Presidential Elections.
Former U.S. Attorney On Awan Indictment: "There Is Something Very Strange Going On Here"
We've written frequently over the past couple of months about the litany of unanswered questions surrounding the mysterious case of Debbie Wasserman Schultz's (DWS) IT staffers. Why did DWS seemingly threaten the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that was confiscated as part of an ongoing legal investigation? Why did DWS keep Awan on her taxpayer funded payroll all the way up until the day he was arrested by the FBI at Dulles airport while trying to flee the country to Pakistan? What, if anything, does the Awan family know about the DNC hacks that may have caused DWS to act in this way?
Now, Andrew McCarthy III, the former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York who led the prosecution against Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, says there is "something very strange" about the recent indictment filed against Imran Awan and his wife Hina Alvi in the District of Columbia.
In a National Review article, McCarthy points out that it's not what's in the indictment that is necessarily surprising but rather what is seemingly intentionally omitted. For instance, McCarthy points out that "the indictment appears to go out of its way not to mention" that Imran was apprehended while in the process of fleeing the country, a fact that would seem to be the best evidence available to prove the fraud charges.
Source: Zero Hedge